MOJ: 211.171.1242074

Research, Reports & Transparency

The evidence behind the work

Three years of audited financial statements, comparative data, and original peer-reviewed research on inequality and digital access — published in full, in both languages, because our supporters and communities deserve nothing less.

Transparency

How we account for every dram

Every year since our founding in 2010, Innovative and Equal has commissioned an independent financial audit and published the results in full, alongside a narrative account of what our programmes achieved, what they cost, and where they fell short. We do this because trust is not a slogan for us — it is a working condition. Our donors, from small individual contributors in the diaspora to institutional grant-makers, are entitled to know precisely how their money moved through our organisation, and our programme participants are entitled to know that the resources committed to their communities were spent as promised.

As a legal entity registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Armenia (registration MOJ: 211.171.1242074), we are bound by statutory reporting obligations: annual financial statements filed with the tax authority, disclosure of founders and governing board members, and — for grants above certain thresholds — itemised reporting to the State Revenue Committee on the use of foreign funding. We treat these obligations as a floor, not a ceiling. Where the law requires a summary, we publish detail; where the law is silent, we publish anyway.

A number of our grants carry donor-specific restrictions — for example, funds earmarked exclusively for digital-literacy equipment in Tavush border communities, or for a named research study rather than general operations. We track restricted and unrestricted funds in separate ledger codes, and our external auditor tests a sample of restricted-fund transactions each year to confirm that money was spent within the terms of the grant agreement. Any variance is disclosed in the relevant annual report, not smoothed away.

Finally, we operate under an open-data commitment: anonymised, aggregate outcome data from our monitoring and evaluation systems, our full audited financial statements, and the underlying survey instruments used in our research are available on request, free of charge, to journalists, researchers, donors, government bodies and members of the public. Write to us at horvathtamas6554@gmail.com and we will send PDF copies within five working days.

Annual Reports

2021, 2022 and 2023 in detail

2023

Annual Impact & Financial Report 2023

In 2023, Innovative and Equal recorded total income of $612,400 (AMD 244,960,000 at the year's average exchange rate of approximately 400 AMD/USD), against total expenditure of $589,100 (AMD 235,640,000), leaving a modest operating surplus of $23,300 carried forward as an unrestricted reserve. Income by source broke down as follows: institutional grants from international foundations and bilateral donors accounted for $367,000 (60%); individual donations from within Armenia contributed $42,900 (7%); diaspora giving — overwhelmingly from Armenian communities in the United States, France and Russia — reached $158,700 (26%); and earned income from our social-enterprise weaving cooperative and training-fee contracts totalled $43,800 (7%).

On the expenditure side, 84.2% of spending — $496,000 — went directly to programme delivery: digital-literacy centres, the girls'-education scholarship fund, rural microenterprise grants and our disability-inclusion initiative. Administrative costs (office, compliance, core staff not assigned to programmes) were $58,900 (10.0%), and fundraising and donor-relations costs were $34,200 (5.8%). This programme ratio of 84.2% exceeded our internal target of 82% and compares favourably to the sector median in Armenia's registered NGO sector.

Our accounts were independently audited by Yerevan-based audit firm Metsamor Audit & Assurance CJSC, a licensed statutory auditor registered with the Chamber of Auditors of Armenia. The auditor issued an unqualified ('clean') opinion, stating that 'the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Innovative and Equal NGO as of 31 December 2023, and its financial performance for the year then ended, in accordance with Armenian accounting standards for non-commercial organisations.' The audit included substantive testing of a sample of 47 individual transactions across restricted grant lines, with no material exceptions noted.

Programmatically, 2023 was our strongest year on record for reach: 3,140 individuals completed at least one digital-literacy module (up from 2,260 in 2022), 96 rural households received microenterprise start-up grants averaging $410 each, and our girls'-education scholarship fund supported 214 secondary-school students across Shirak, Lori, Tavush and Syunik provinces, of whom 201 completed the academic year, a 93.9% retention rate. Our disability-inclusion pilot, launched in March 2023 in Gyumri and Vanadzor, enrolled 58 adults with physical and sensory disabilities in vocational and assistive-technology training, with 39 subsequently securing paid or self-employed work within six months of graduation.

The year was not without setbacks. A planned expansion of our digital centres into Armavir province was delayed by seven months due to a landlord dispute over a proposed training-centre lease in Armavir town, forcing us to redirect that quarter's cohort to a temporary space in a school gymnasium with weaker internet infrastructure — a decision that measurably slowed module-completion times for that cohort by an average of 11 days. We have since signed a five-year lease on a permanent Armavir facility, opening in Q2 2024. We also recorded a higher-than-expected currency-conversion loss of $6,100 on a euro-denominated grant, prompting a policy change: as of January 2024 all multi-year grants over €20,000 are hedged through forward contracts with our banking partner.

2022

Annual Impact & Financial Report 2022

2022 total income reached $541,000 (AMD 216,400,000 at an average rate of 400 AMD/USD), against expenditure of $528,600 (AMD 211,440,000), yielding a small surplus of $12,400. Income by source: institutional grants $312,000 (57.7%); individual domestic donations $38,500 (7.1%); diaspora giving $161,200 (29.8%, unusually high this year owing to a one-off matched-giving campaign following the aftermath of renewed border tensions); and earned income $29,300 (5.4%).

Programme spending was $436,400 (82.6%), administration $57,900 (11.0%), and fundraising $34,300 (6.4%) — our tightest year on the 82% programme-ratio threshold. Independent audit was again performed by Metsamor Audit & Assurance CJSC, which issued an unqualified opinion, noting explicitly that 'no instances of restricted-fund misapplication were identified in the sample tested,' covering 39 transactions.

Key outcomes: 2,260 people completed digital-literacy training; 74 microenterprise grants disbursed at an average of $395; 189 girls supported through the scholarship fund with a 91% completion rate; and our first cohort of 27 participants in a newly launched legal-literacy programme for rural women in Tavush and Syunik, covering property rights, inheritance law and domestic-violence protections.

This was also the year we absorbed the sharpest cost shock in our history: inflation in construction and IT-equipment prices (driven by regional supply-chain disruption) pushed our per-participant digital-centre equipment cost up by 34% compared to 2021, forcing us to defer a planned fourth Tavush centre to 2023. Lesson learned: we now hold a 6% contingency line in every capital-equipment budget line, a policy adopted from Q1 2023 onward.

2021

Annual Impact & Financial Report 2021

In 2021, still contending with pandemic-era disruption, total income was $478,900 (AMD 191,560,000), against expenditure of $469,700 (AMD 187,880,000), a surplus of $9,200. Income sources: institutional grants $296,900 (62.0%); individual domestic donations $31,100 (6.5%); diaspora giving $121,300 (25.3%); earned income $29,600 (6.2%).

Programme expenditure was $393,400 (83.7%), administration $52,600 (11.2%), fundraising $23,700 (5.1%). The audit, our first engagement with Metsamor Audit & Assurance CJSC after a competitive re-tender of our audit contract, resulted in an unqualified opinion with one emphasis-of-matter paragraph drawing attention to pandemic-related uncertainty in projecting 2022 grant renewals — standard practice in that period and not indicative of any irregularity.

2021 outcomes included 1,640 digital-literacy completions (many delivered in blended online/offline format due to continuing COVID-19 restrictions), 58 microenterprise grants, and 162 scholarship recipients. It was also the year we piloted remote learning kits — solar-charged tablets pre-loaded with offline curricula — for 40 households in Tavush villages without reliable electricity, a response to the acute access gap the pandemic exposed.

Challenges: three planned in-person training cohorts were cancelled or postponed due to COVID-19 movement restrictions in the first half of the year, and one partner organisation in Syunik temporarily withdrew from a joint programme over capacity constraints, delaying a planned 220-participant vocational cohort to early 2022. We learned to build 15% schedule slack into every quarterly programme plan going forward, a practice retained since.

Comparative Data

Three years at a glance, 2021–2023

Comparative financial and outcome data 2021 to 2023
Indicator202120222023
Total income (USD)$478,900$541,000$612,400
Total income (AMD)191,560,000216,400,000244,960,000
Total expenditure (USD)$469,700$528,600$589,100
Programme ratio83.7%82.6%84.2%
Institutional grants share62.0%57.7%60.0%
Diaspora giving share25.3%29.8%26.0%
Digital-literacy completions1,6402,2603,140
Scholarship recipients162189214
Audit opinionUnqualifiedUnqualifiedUnqualified

Publications

Original research from our team

Working Paper Series No. 14, Caucasus Social Policy Review · 2023

Bridging the Village: Digital Literacy, Age and Gender Gaps in Rural Armenia (2020–2023)

Dr. Lusine Petrosyan, Dr. Anahit Ghazaryan, with T. Mkrtchyan and S. Avetisyan

This paper reports findings from a four-year longitudinal study (2020–2023) tracking digital-literacy acquisition among 1,840 residents of 62 villages across Shirak, Lori, Tavush, Syunik and Armavir provinces, comparing outcomes across a treatment group enrolled in Innovative and Equal's community digital centres and a matched comparison group drawn from neighbouring, non-programme villages. Using a difference-in-differences design combined with qualitative life-history interviews (n=94), we find that structured, in-person digital-literacy instruction produced statistically significant gains in functional digital competency (an 11-item composite index covering device operation, online-service navigation, basic cybersecurity awareness, and information verification), with treatment-group scores rising from a baseline mean of 2.4/11 to 7.1/11 over eighteen months, compared to a rise from 2.6/11 to 3.8/11 in the comparison group.

The gains were not evenly distributed. Women over 45 in border and mountainous communities (Tavush and Syunik) began with the lowest baseline scores (mean 1.6/11) but showed the largest proportional gains when instruction was delivered by female facilitators from the same or a neighbouring village — a finding with direct implications for facilitator recruitment strategy. Younger participants (18–29) converged toward a ceiling effect within six months regardless of facilitator characteristics, suggesting that for this cohort the binding constraint is not instruction but device and connectivity access rather than skill.

We also document a persistent 'second-order' digital divide: even among participants who achieved high functional-competency scores, use of digital tools for civic participation (accessing government e-services, following local-council communications, participating in online consultations) remained low, at 18% of high-competency participants, compared to 61% who used the same skills for social communication and 44% for commerce. We argue this reflects not a skills gap but a trust and relevance gap in citizens' relationship to digital state services, and we recommend that digital-literacy programming be paired with targeted civic-engagement content and, ideally, with visible improvements in the responsiveness of e-government services themselves.

Methodology

Mixed-methods longitudinal design; n=1,840 quantitative survey respondents (920 treatment, 920 matched comparison) across 62 villages in 5 provinces; 94 semi-structured life-history interviews; 11-item digital-competency index validated against ITU digital-skills framework; difference-in-differences regression with village fixed effects.

Headline findings

  • In-person, community-based instruction outperforms self-directed online learning for first-time digital users by a factor of nearly 2x on the composite competency index.
  • Facilitator gender and local origin significantly moderate outcomes for older rural women.
  • A persistent civic-engagement gap exists independent of technical skill acquisition.

Journal of Post-Soviet Rural Development, Vol. 9, No. 2 · 2022

The Geography of Getting By: Income Inequality and Migration Pressure in Armenia's Border Provinces

Dr. Anahit Ghazaryan, Dr. Lusine Petrosyan, with H. Sargsyan

Drawing on household survey data from 2,410 households across Tavush, Syunik and Gegharkunik — Armenia's border provinces — this study quantifies the relationship between proximity to contested or closed borders, household income volatility, and stated migration intent. We construct a border-proximity index (distance-weighted, accounting for road quality and the frequency of security-related access restrictions) and regress it against household income, income volatility (measured as coefficient of variation across four seasonal survey waves), and a five-point migration-intent scale.

We find that households within 5 kilometres of an active or contested border section report household incomes 31% lower on average than comparable households 25+ kilometres from the border, controlling for education, land holdings and household size, and report income volatility roughly 2.3 times higher — driven largely by unpredictable restrictions on agricultural access to border-adjacent land and periodic disruption to local trade routes. Migration intent (defined as reporting active plans, within two years, to relocate at least one working-age household member) was reported by 43% of border-proximate households compared to 22% of interior comparison households.

Qualitatively, respondents in border villages such as those near Berd and Chinari described a specific psychology of chronic contingency: investment in perennial crops, home improvement, or children's long-term schooling plans were frequently deferred or scaled back, described by one respondent as 'building a house you're not sure you'll get to keep.' We argue that targeted, non-humanitarian economic interventions — vocational diversification away from border-adjacent agriculture, digital and remote-work skill-building that decouples income from physical proximity to the border, and community-level insurance or income-smoothing mechanisms — are more effective retention tools than general rural development spending that does not account for the specific risk profile of border communities.

Methodology

Household survey, n=2,410, four seasonal waves (2021–2022), Tavush, Syunik and Gegharkunik provinces; border-proximity index constructed via GIS distance-weighting; multivariate regression controlling for education, land holdings, household size; 61 semi-structured qualitative interviews.

Headline findings

  • Border proximity is independently associated with a 31% income penalty and 2.3x higher income volatility.
  • Migration intent nearly doubles in border-proximate households.
  • Economic diversification away from border-adjacent agriculture outperforms general aid in reducing migration intent.

Working Paper Series No. 9, Caucasus Social Policy Review · 2021

Who Gets to Ask for Help? Gendered Barriers to Social-Service Access in Post-2018 Armenia

Dr. Lusine Petrosyan, with N. Vardanyan and Dr. Anahit Ghazaryan

This study examines why women in rural Armenian communities under-utilise available social-protection and legal-aid services relative to documented need, drawing on a mixed-methods sample of 1,120 women across Shirak, Lori and Ararat provinces, combined with service-utilisation administrative data and 76 in-depth interviews. We find that awareness of entitlements is high (81% of respondents could correctly name at least two social benefits they were formally eligible for) but actual application rates are low (34%), and successful receipt rates lower still (21%).

The primary barriers identified were not informational but social and logistical: fear of community gossip and reputational cost associated with visibly seeking state assistance (cited by 58% of non-applicants), lack of independent transport to district administrative centres (47%), and — for legal aid specifically related to inheritance or domestic-violence protection — fear of retaliation from family members whose interests conflicted with the applicant's claim (39% among the subsample seeking legal remedies).

We tested an intervention — community-based, women-staffed 'rights navigator' desks embedded within existing digital-literacy centres, offering confidential, in-person guidance and application support — across four pilot villages against four matched comparison villages. Application rates in pilot villages rose from a baseline of 33% to 61% within twelve months, with successful receipt rates rising from 19% to 44%. We conclude that co-locating rights-navigation support within a non-stigmatised community institution (in this case, a digital-literacy centre generally understood as a 'skills' venue rather than a 'welfare' venue) substantially reduces the reputational cost of seeking help, and recommend this model for replication.

Methodology

Mixed-methods; n=1,120 household survey respondents, Shirak, Lori and Ararat provinces; 76 in-depth interviews; matched four-village pilot vs four-village comparison quasi-experimental design; twelve-month follow-up on service-application and receipt outcomes.

Headline findings

  • 81% awareness of entitlements coexists with only 34% application and 21% successful receipt rates.
  • Reputational and logistical barriers dominate over informational gaps.
  • Embedding rights-navigation in non-stigmatised venues nearly doubled application rates within a year.

Data Ethics & Access

Consent, anonymisation, and how to request full documents

All research conducted or commissioned by Innovative and Equal follows a written data-ethics protocol reviewed annually by our board. Every survey and interview participant provides informed consent, recorded either in writing or, for participants with low literacy, verbally with a witnessed thumbprint or audio-recorded confirmation. Participants may withdraw consent and have their data removed at any point up to publication. All individual-level data is anonymised prior to analysis; village names are retained only where aggregate results are reported at a level that cannot identify individuals, and any case study using an identifiable name and photograph (see our Impact & Success Stories page) is separately and explicitly consented to by the subject in addition to the general research consent.

Full PDF copies of every annual report and every publication listed above — including underlying survey instruments, interview guides, and de-identified datasets suitable for secondary analysis — are available free of charge on request. Write to horvathtamas6554@gmail.com specifying the document(s) you would like, and our research team will respond within five working days.

Curious how this evidence shapes our programming, or want to support the next report? See our programmes or get involved.